by Dave Galvin, PSI president emeritus as well as first president of the North American Hazardous Materials Management Association
One of my grounding work philosophies was to innovate locally while coordinating nationally and even internationally (“think global, act local” we were told in the 1970s) for all of my 40 years working for Seattle Metro and King County. We can learn from each other, but we have to be willing to innovate locally with a grounded view as to what is going on nationally and internationally, and how we can both learn from others and influence others. I spent my career following those principals: work locally to do the best job we could while coordinating nationally to learn from others and to influence others to keep us all moving in the right direction. This yin-yang approach is, I believe, key to innovation and positive change at the local government level.
It was critically important for me to have a group such as PSI in order to learn from others around the country and beyond as well as to influence national policy direction. Local governments can’t do these big policy lifts alone, they need coordinated help from others around the country and even beyond, such as the European Union. Yet local governments have the flexibility to enact innovative polities that are more difficult to enact up the food chain.
PSI serves as the unique organization made up of state and local governments that helps us at the local and state levels to do the best we can with progressive policy issues related to product stewardship while coordinating nationally and internationally for the best results. It is actually a conservative approach: let local governments and states innovate, then learn from these models to develop national policy.
PSI is a model for positive policy development related to solid waste management, recycling and product stewardship initiatives. We need to invest in PSI in order to keep the momentum for positive change: to maximize recycling, and to shift the paradigm so that producers of waste are expected to pay for and run take-back systems for the wastes their products produce, from packaging to the end-of-life products themselves. We need to keep pushing for these universal, global, ecological concepts as we deal with day-to-day politics.
I have enjoyed my 3+ decades of association with Scott Cassel and PSI, including serving as PSI board President for more than ten years. PSI is the KEY organization that can integrate what we have learned over the past 40+ years, assess the current climate nationally and internationally, and lead progressive policy initiatives within receptive states and nationally as politics allow.
Please support and participate in PSI’s programs. If we wish to fully address climate change, we need to address how we deal with wastes. The sooner we can achieve a one-to-one take back system such as advocated by McDonough and Braungart’s classic tome from 2002, “Cradle to Cradle,” the better. We need to do better than today’s reality. We need to reach for the sky, for what will actually result in a sustainable future.
The Product Stewardship Institute has served as a compass for the past 20 years regarding a sustainable model for product design and waste management. Let’s continue to push for this ideal in order to generate enough initiative locally and with states to influence the national and world view. Product manufacturers need to take full responsibility for the life cycle of their outputs, including taking back and re-manufacturing end-of-life products they sell. The sooner we can move to this conservative paradigm, the better!
Thanks for your support of PSI and its initiatives. The more we can advocate for full product stewardship, the more our environment will benefit locally as well as across this fragile globe.