What’s a Mother for? Mainers Speak Out for Product Stewardship

You know when your parents grow up and you realize that they’ve been listening to you all along?! On Tuesday, my Mom attended a packed-house ‘listening session’ on the new Maine governor’s controversial proposals for regulatory reform. These proposals have made news around the country, as all of us who have been following Maine’s leadership on product stewardship watch with bated breath to see what will happen under this new administration.

Mainers are speaking out, and showing up in droves at listening sessions around the state. My Mom ended up handing in her prepared remarks in writing after three hours of waiting to deliver them yesterday. I’m proud of her and other Mainers who are not policy wonks steeped in “product stewardship” and “EPR,” just people who have common sense, passion for family and community, and the perspective of how time and our actions change the places we love, both for better and for worse.

Even though we don’t talk “EPR,” “waste  hierarchy,” and “federal preemption” much around the dinner table, these are the themes I hear loud and clear in my mom’s remarks, below. She taught me to stand up for myself and my beliefs, take responsibility for my actions, and clean my room every Saturday morning. To me, these themes are also present in her remarks. Maybe it’s really that I’ve been listening to her all along!

Go Mom, and go Maine.

Karen Fletcher
Freeport , Maine
February 9, 2011

Regulatory Fairness and Reform Committee
Public Hearing

Senator Courtney and Committee members:

My name is Karen Fletcher.  I am a resident of Freeport, Maine.  I am here today representing myself.

I want to begin by thanking you for your public service…and for your participation in the continuing process of trying to ensure regulatory fairness. I am in favor of transparency, fairness, effectiveness and efficiency…goals that are part of the stated intent of your committee. These goals must be fair for ALL of Maine…and not just for the one sector.

I am NOT in favor of reforms that benefit an individual segment of our society at the expense of our air, our water, our quality of life, and our own health and well being as well as that of future generations.

When I read Phase I of Governor’s Regulatory Reform  proposals on the Governor’s website, I marked it up with many, many notes, some question marks, and quite a few exclamation points.  I am here today to share my fear that this current round of regulatory reform could  lead to roll backs to the “bad old days.”  Given the restrictions on time, and the more eloquent speakers here today, I will address two areas that arise in more than one of the proposals.

  1. Standards:  The governor’s regulatory reform proposals discuss having Maine’s regulations “conform” to Federal standards.  I believe that Maine should consider Federal standards to be minimum standards and that we should meet them.  But I also believe that Maine should exceed those standards when our individual and unique needs require that we do so.  Federal standards have to accommodate the great diversity of the United States.  Maine standards  have to be sure to continue to protect the uniqueness of our environment and the needs of our people. If that means that we have a higher standard…good for us! (Using this same logic, I support the option of municipal standards that might exceed state standards.)
  2. Consumer Products:  The governor’s regulatory reform proposals also call for reviewing all recycling and take back statues ensuring that “manufacturers do not have to pay to recycle their consumer products”.   As I read this section…and I ended up with many exclamation points… there were two images that came to my mind.  One was from the past:  the open, burning dump that we used to go to every Saturday morning when we moved to Maine 34 years ago. (I am proud to say we have a very active  recycling center).  The other image was from that very morning:  I had been working on our income tax forms and  had to replace the ink cartridge in the  printer.  When I opened the package there was a mailer to return the used cartridge for recycling.  How great was that!  It was easy for me to do the right thing; I thought good thoughts about the manufacturer (Hewlett Packard); and it was certainly better  for the environment.  Oh, and, I have no illusion that anyone other than I paid for the cost of the mailer as I am sure the manufacturer passed that cost along to me.

In conclusion, as you continue the process of reviewing  the  proposed changes in regulations, please, please, please be sure that you keep Maine moving forward with regulatory reforms that build on the environmental protections that have been developed over decades by bipartisan, cooperative, efforts engaging all sectors of our society. 

Thank you for the opportunity to share my concerns.

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 thoughts on “What’s a Mother for? Mainers Speak Out for Product Stewardship

  1. K.M. Hurley says:

    I, too, recall the New England town dumps of old — where you just threw it on the pile, a fire was lit, and the stuff smoldered and smoked heavy for a few days then less-so for the rest of the week. Very particular smell I vividly recall but, happily, I haven’t smelled since the recycling center was installed about 20 years ago. Anyway, I live in New Hampshire. We don’t like regulations, state or federal. Except this one: a gift certificate given in the state of NH never expires; this means your $50 at the LL Bean outlet is as valid in 2015 as it is today when I hand you the voucher. That law is an example of the a state regulation going above and beyond federal mandates — to protect the citizen. Do I think too many of those rules are ridiculous? Yes. But we are so very very far from too many Product Stewardship protections and guidelines for both citizens and the environment that at this stage it would be silly to worry we’ll go too far. Let’s get these stewardship programs at least into second gear before we worry about breaking the speed limit. I read an article recently about how New England is poised to become to the New Green Economy what Silicon Valley was to the Computing Industry… let’s make it happen. http://deepforestgreen.wordpress.com/2010/12/25/new-england-the-new-green-economy-epicenter/

  2. peg bonarrigo says:

    I applaud your efforts, Karen.

    Now that we are grown up and listening to our children, maybe we can help with the trash.

  3. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by MS2 and Global PSC, Product Stewardship . Product Stewardship said: Maine Residents Speak Out for Product Stewardship http://ow.ly/3UNsa #maine #stewardship #epr #productstewardship […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: