Two Electronics Recycler Certification Programs?

 

 

Below is a blog post by Sarah Westervelt, the e-Waste Project Coordinator at the Basel Action Network (BAN) and the Recycling Coordinator for the Electronics TakeBack Coalition, in preparation for the PSI Networking Conference Call, “How to Choose a Reputable Recycler: Update on the R2 and e-Stewards Certification Programs,” on Thursday, November 18th (2:00-3:30 p.m. EST).  Sarah’s work includes administering the Electronic Recycler’s Pledge of True Stewardship, educating the public about the global toxics and legal issues associated with exporting e-waste, as well as highlighting the worst-case scenarios.  Sarah co-authored BAN exposés including films and reports documenting horrific “recycling” of the world’s e-waste in China and Nigeria.  Sarah has a Master’s Degree in Organizational Systems Renewal from Antioch University, and worked for years as a consultant in organizational development before joining the Basel Action Network in 2001.  Click here for more information on the PSI Networking Conference Calls.

For years, there has been little more than pilot programs, pledges and a great deal of concern about what electronics recyclers are actually doing with the e-waste they collect.  While federal regulations  exempt much of this waste stream, the relatively new electronics recycling industry has been plagued by unscrupulous companies that profit largely by exporting scrap or untested/non-working equipment to countries that cannot legally trade in hazardous waste with the US, as defined in a United Nations treaty called the Basel Convention.

© Basel Action Network 2008.

© Basel Action Network 2008.

As of this year there are not one, but two accredited certification programs for electronics recyclers in the US, both of which are recognized by the US EPA  – the e-Stewards Certification program and the Responsible Recycling (R2) Certification program.   The question is,  what are the differences, and which one of them will best serve your needs?  Having two programs requires some homework on the part of customers or officials.

To get to the bottom of this question, it is important to compare the standards themselves, as well as the rigor of the verification system (i.e. the certification bodies which certify that recyclers conform to a particular standard, and the accreditation bodies that oversee their work.)

Let’s start with comparing the verification systems.  Both R2 and e-Stewards certification programs utilize the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board as their accreditation body.  ANAB is one of the top three accreditation bodies in the world, and is the largest, most respected in the United States.

Next, let’s look at the certification bodies (CBs) that are accredited by ANAB to certify to either R2 or the e-Stewards Standard.   Each of the programs has three certification bodies that are accredited to certify to their respective standards.  An important question is how rigorous and consistent the auditor training is for each program, with the goal of having a high level of confidence that the auditors across all the CBs consistently understand the standard they are auditing to and program requirements.   Without an owner for the standard or host organization until this fall, the R2 program has not had a sole auditor training program since its inception, resulting in a variety of auditor trainings for the different CBs.  The e-Stewards program requires that all auditors must successfully complete a 3-day training provided by SAI Global, one of the top professional training organizations.

Finally, and central to every certification program, are the standards that define requirements for the companies attaining certification.  The R2 Practice document, which was finalized without support from the environmental community, is 13 pages long, with no guidance document, but it comes with an audit checklist.  The e-Stewards Standard, created by the Basel Action Network in conjunction with leaders in the recycling and refurbishment industries, and supported by 70 organizations, is 49 pages long.  It has a 67 page companion guidance document, but no auditor check list.  Based on the shear length of the two standards, it is easy to understand that one spells out much more comprehensive requirements for the recyclers.

There are two basic types of requirements in each of the standards.  One set of requirements is for the environmental management system (EMS), which involves a Plan-Do-Check-Act system for identifying, documenting, and reducing the environmental impacts of the business operations.   The R2 Practices has one page of general requirements that an R2 recycler’s EMS must meet .  The e-Stewards Standard has the 8-page global standard for environmental management systems, called ISO 14001, imbedded in it, so that all certified e-Stewards are also certified to ISO 14001.

Within this framework of an EMS, both standards require some minimum performance requirements, which are the second basic type of requirements in these two standards.   Performance requirements are industry-specific restrictions of or prescriptions for certain activities.   Along with the EMS requirements, this is where the two standards differ dramatically.

The chart below summaries some of these differences:

Does the Standard…   R2 Practices e-Stewards Standard for the Responsible Recycling and Reuse of Electronics
…Allow toxic materials in solid waste landfills & incinerators? Yes.  If circumstances beyond the control of the R2 recycler disrupt its normal management of the toxic materials, it may utilize solid waste disposal facilities, to the extent allowed under applicable law.   No, as it was deemed inappropriate for heavy metals and other hazardous materials to be disposed of in solid waste disposal facilities.
…Ban the export of toxic materials to developing countries? No.  R2, in principle, calls for only allowing the export of  equipment and components containing ‘focus materials’ to countries that legally accept them, but does not ban them from rich to poorer countries. Yes.  Based on the international definitions found in the Basel Convention, toxic materials bound for recycling or disposal are not allowed to go from developed to developing countries, consistent with the Amendment to the Basel Convention, already ratified by 65 countries, including the European Union.
…Require accountability for toxics throughout final processing? Limited. Yes, with detailed performance requirements for downstream audits, documentation, and restrictions for initial and on-going accountability.
…Allow untested or non-working equipment to be exported to developing countries for refurbishment (which can transfer hazardous waste)? Yes. No.
…Have detailed minimum requirements for occupational health and safety? Left to the R2 recycler to determine. Yes, developed with a great deal of input from state occupational health and safety experts.
…Allows the shredding of mercury-containing devices? Yes, “if they are too small to remove safely at reasonable cost, and workers are protected…”, and if the mercury-containing materials are sent to licensed facilities that utilize technology designed to manage it. No.  There are no safe levels of mercury, and currently no shredders that can capture all mercury vapors.  Shredding mercury disperses it into the shredded mixed materials, the workplace, and the environment.
…Prohibit the use of prisoners to recycle toxic electronic waste? No. Yes.

While having two certification programs requires some due diligence, most people welcome the arrival of new mechanisms for holding an industry accountable for managing a toxic waste stream.

Check out the companion post to this blog piece by John Lingelbach of R2 Solutions.

 

© Basel Action Network 2008.

© Basel Action Network 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

12 thoughts on “Two Electronics Recycler Certification Programs?

  1. I’m understanding from some of the recyclers that it cost $30,000+ to get certified by e-Stewards, is that correct? What is the cost for R2? If only the big boys can play due to cost of certifcation, what does that do to a growing industry that has different rules to deal with in every state? Many Fed/state/local governments may want to use either certification as an RFP criteria, but also require Women-owned, Minority owned and Veteran based business for diversity requirements, how do these guys get in the game with that cost overhead?

    There is a difference in recyclers, some actually do more than seperate e-scrap into brokerable commodities, some just wholesale specific commodities, some wholesale cherry picked parts and discard the rest for others to broker. Both e-stewards and R2 seem to apply to the first class, but the cost for certification is a barrier to expanding a smaller operation to a larger one. This will consolidate infrastructure to a few and monolpolize the industry to increase carrying costs.

    The E-scrap industry was an industry that was not regulated until recently, costs will go up to be compliant. We still lack infrastructure in the US to handle the “real” recycling part of recycling. These two systems do not remove the impedemints to grow the infrastructure we need to accomplish either certification’s goals. Is there a plan via Fed./State/ Local laws and land use to build infrastructure? How do we make this system leaner and more accountable?

    • Lauren Roman says:

      It CAN cost $30k + to get certified to either e-Stewards OR R2. Completely depends upon the size and complexity of the operation. A recycler with few employees and a simple dismantling/resale operation is going to incur far less in Certification Body fees than a large operation with mechanical processing and dozens of employees.

      In the absence of tight regulation, certification is the only option available for e-recyclers to demonstrate they are making an effort to protect their clients’ interests. And working with certified recyclers will be the only smart choice for responsible generators of e-waste. If that means they pay a little more to do the right thing, so be it. It cost a lot more to get rid of hazardous waste when RCRA passed, but who can argue that we should have stayed w/the status quo of randomly dumping all of our hazardous waste?

      As far as lacking the infrastructure for the ‘real’ part of recycling, I suggest you get a show of hands on how many e-recyclers are out there that have excess capacity they are dying to fill. Then ask them if they get ‘too busy’ would they not expand to meet the growing need?

      How do we make this system leaner and more accountable? By growing the demand for accountable recycling, which will only really happen with federal legislation.

    • Dennis Gillan with AQA International—full disclosure. We can issue a free quote for e-Stewards. Every company is different, but the standard is the same—give us a call or send me an e-mail and we can prepare a free quote for you.

      Dennis Gillan
      dgillan@aqainternational.com
      800.281.4383

  2. Sarah implies that no environmental organization supports R2. That’s incorrect.

  3. Angel says:

    hey there and thank you for your info – I have definitely picked up anything new from right here.

    I did however expertise some technical issues using this site, as I experienced to reload the site many times previous to I could get it to load correctly.
    I had been wondering if your hosting is OK?
    Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading
    instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google
    and could damage your high quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
    Well I’m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more of your respective exciting content. Ensure that you update this again very soon.

  4. Although the barbell squat supplies a better quantity of stimulation to your
    physique as a whole because of to your involvement of a larger amount of muscle, a leg press machine
    will offer larger growth stimulation for that musculature in the
    hips and thighs.

  5. The article posted was extremely informative and
    helpful. You folks are performing a terrific job.
    Maintain going.

  6. Cali Doby says:

    I really like and appreciate your post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  7. Brigitte says:

    I am no longer certain where you are getting your info, but great topic.
    I needs to spend some time studying much more or working out more.
    Thank you for great info I was in search of this info for my mission.
    it audit hong kong

  8. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after going through some of the posts I realized it’s new to me.

    Anyways, I’m definitely pleased I found it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back regularly!

  9. Candra says:

    If you’ve got the desire to be your own boss and to make a full-time or part-time income, starting a letting
    agency is definitely for you. In such cases you will be researching the Property management software
    available in the market. Not only this, the chance of losing
    cheques is greatly reduced.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: